Welcoem to posts!!
in the future - u will be able to do some more stuff here,,,!! like pat catgirl- i mean um yeah... for now u can only see others's posts :c
I hate the internet...
2 - 7
Small rant: I fucking hate those corny ahh anime edits that yap about philosophy or dark psychology. I just find it stupid and cringe at how they try to act all "deep" because they know some surface level knowledge of some popular philosophy topic like stoicism or absurdism or alternatively a very common manipulation tactic like gaslighting or love bombing. It only gets worse with the stupid corny anime edits I mentioned earlier, because associating anime with your already surface level pseudo-intellectual philosophy makes me cringe even more.
7 - 5
What are y'all favorite Lovecraft books?
3 - 2
Tbh, I find it funny how a lot of powerscallers (including myself) use ZFC Set Theory despite it arguably being the most complex and abstract field of mathematics (aside from maybe Category or Model Theory but idk) as it's the foundation of modern mathematics providing an axiomatic framework for sets which can be used to denote literally all of mathematics from functions to tensors. Not only that but we had to focus on large cardinality of all things, probably the hardest part of Set Theory as it was supposed to provide logical frameworks to something as abstract and as paradoxical as infinity itself. I'm glad that actually Set Theorist hasn't seen our debates yet, because they'll absolutely cringe seeing at just how terrible our understanding is lol.
5 - 6
Lmao, I just saw someone claim that Godzilla's atomic breath is "sub-atomic" despite it being clearly visible to the visible light spectrum (whose wavelength is bigger than an atom). I already knew Powerscallers can be pretty careless in their physics, but the fact that they even suggested this is stupid.
(Note: As I said before, DO NOT try to harass them and I'll not be mentioning their names for that sake)
3 - 0
Random ahh math question
Consider a random matrix A of the size N x N, where the entries of A are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables with mean zero and variance 1. Specifically, assume that the entries of A are drawn from a normal distribution, Aij ∼ N(0,1), for all i,j.
Let 𝜆1, 𝜆2,…, 𝜆N be the eigenvalues of the matrix A.
What is the distribution of the eigenvalues 𝜆1, 𝜆2,…, 𝜆N for large N (as N →∞)?
(Note: the | symbol in this context is to denote fractions rather than the absolute value, mostly because of how I can't really type a fraction and it's actually really confusing if I just use / for both fraction and division)
1 - 2
Powerscallers don't understand Physics moment Pt. 1
"Many-Worlds Interpretation/Type III Multiverse is 1-C/1-B"
No this is false, it's not even past universal actually. This is what happens when you base your understanding of Physics, especially from a complex topic like Quantum mechanics, from YouTube.
The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics was proposed by Physicist Hugh Everett as an alternative to the Copenhagen Interpretation, which in case you're wondering is basically Schrodinger's Cat on a Quantum system.
It proposes that the entire universe in itself is considered as a Quantum system that exists in a constant of superposition. The concept of wave function collapse is removed upon Macroscopic influence and is instead replaced by alternating branches in which a Quantum system (or particle for that matter) has its wave function take two different routes. No new universe is being created as it all takes place within a singular universe in on itself, and also this is only applicable towards Quantum systems and not Macroscopic systems so these parallel "worlds" are no different if MWI were to be believed.
5 - 11
I'm back now, I'm okay in case you're wondering
3 - 6
Going to be inactive for a while, my friend committed the thing
2 - 9
I know this is late and all but R.I.P David Lynch...
4 - 1