https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7TFWKWd9-c
K$ Decides To Work For Law Enforcement

https://www.instagram.com/fasscoupe/reel/C6upTUQOIrp/
66 likes, 17 comments - fasscoupe on May 8, 2024: "Full video in @wetothecrib Bi🍩. K$ Of ENTL aka Confidential Witness - 21.". fasscoupe and wetothecrib ... He asked for a reduce ticket on work and when he didn't get it he sent all his niggas to the feds😂😂😂 ... Where can I find the paperwork. 7w Reply. May 8. Log in to like or

https://www.instagram.com/fasscoupe/reel/C6sH_bkOs3j/
150 likes, 37 comments - fasscoupe on May 7, 2024: "ENTL K$ Wore A Wire W. Camera For Feds The Whole Time. The Reason You Need To Get Out The Streets 勞 Full Video In Bio". 150 likes, 37 comments - fasscoupe on May 7, 2024: "ENTL K$ Wore A Wire W. Camera For Feds The Whole Time. ... The Reason You Need To Get Out The Streets 😳🤯👀🏠

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-is-the-laws-on-a-confidential-informant-that--2155399.html
Charged With A Criminal Case? Steps To Take Before Hiring An Attorney Leah Heather Mayersohn, Attorney Domestic Violence in Florida Leah Heather Mayersohn, Attorney 5 Reasons to Hire a Maine Lawyer for OUI Chris A Nielsen, Attorney Individuals with Alzheimer's/Dementia Facing Criminal Prosecution Jessica Dawn Hollan, Attorney

https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2022/sep/15/government-snitches-rake-millions-their-testimony-leading-cause-wrongful-convictions/
By 2016, it found that 81 of 116 death penalty exonerations involved perjury or false testimony by incentivized witnesses — an increase of up to 70%. Barry Scheck's Innocence Project found that 25% of DNA exonerations involved the knowing use of false incentivized witness testimony, and 11% involved the use of coerced witness testimony.

https://www.afslaw.com/perspectives/alerts/nlrb-rules-employer-may-be-required-provide-union-witness-statements-internal
Morgenroth also denied the Union's request for witness statements, stating: The employer conducted a confidential investigation regarding the allegations, as such disclosures of this information would breach witness confidentiality. The Grievant (whom you represent) was present when the incident(s) occurred, so you already have this information.

https://www.dandodiary.com/2013/07/articles/securities-litigation/the-confidential-witness-problem-in-securities-litigation/
In an unusual July 9, 2013 post-settlement order in the Lockheed Martin securities class action lawsuit, Southern District of New York Jed Rakoff examines the role of confidential witness-based allegations, both in the Lockheed case itself and in securities cases in general. As is clear from Judge Rakoff's memorandum, the plaintiffs

https://www.troutman.com/insights/confidential-witnesses-in-securities-litigation-handle-with-care.html
The phenomenon of the confidential witness is a byproduct of the substantially heightened pleading requirements set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) and imposed by decisions, such as Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights. However, the practice of relying on confidential witnesses places enormous strains on plaintiffs

https://www.whistleblowers.gov/memo/2016-07-15
For confidential witness interviews, Whistleblower Investigators are reminded to say (including in audio recordings), "Your interview will be protected to the fullest extent of the law." However, the investigator shall answer questions posed about confidentiality with only the information noted above, as referenced in the Whistleblower

https://www.littler.com/publication-press/press/taking-company-documents-support-whistleblowing-when-self-help-unlawful
Even as federal protections for whistleblowers have expanded, employers can still take strategic actions to address employees taking confidential and proprietary business information to provide to a governmental agency or for use in a whistleblower action.The Current ConflictTwo business-critical policies underlying U.S. law are clashing. One policy protects companies against theft and

https://www.seriousdefense.com/blog/2021/03/what-happens-if-you-share-information-with-a-confidential-informant-or-undercover-officer/
A confidential informant may wear a wire, which means they taped your conversation and it can become evidence in the court case against you. If you believe you accidentally admitted criminal activity to an informant or undercover officer , or if you face charges based on speaking to one of these individuals, you have the right to defend

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/08/timeline-of-fbi-investigation-of-trumps-handling-of-highly-classified-documents/
In total, the FBI took possession of 18 government documents marked as top secret, 54 marked as secret, 31 marked as confidential, according to a detailed list of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago.

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/court-rules-whistleblowers-can-use-confidential-company-documents-to-expose-fraud
Judge Bashant held that whistleblowers are permitted to take company documents to disclose fraud to the government for two reasons. First, "whistleblowers often need documentary evidence to

https://today.westlaw.com/Document/Ic09a2fe0ee4f11ec9f24ec7b211d8087/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
This includes allowing whistleblowers lawfully to (a) disclose internal Company business information — including documents and "trade secret" information — to an appropriate governmental enforcement agency in order to support a report of possible unlawful conduct that has occurred or is occurring within the Company; (b) "misappropriate" "trade secret" information and use the information to

https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/2022/05/27/confidential-witnesses-in-securities-litigation-handle-with-care/
These insider sources are often former employees of the defendants, who are described in the complaint as "confidential witnesses," e.g., confidential witness 1 (CW1), confidential witness 2

https://puryearlaw.com/2016/01/29/federal-interception-and-disclosure-of-wire-oral-or-electronic-communications-charges/
(iv) to intercept any wire or electronic communication the transmission of which is causing harmful interference to any lawfully operating station or consumer electronic equipment, to the extent necessary to identify the source of such interference; or (v) for other users of the same frequency to intercept any radio communication made through a

https://www.workplaceethicsadvice.com/2018/03/whistleblowers-can-use-confidential-company-documents-to-expose-fraud.html
Judge Bashant held that whistleblowers are permitted to take company documents to disclose fraud to the government for two reasons. First, "whistleblowers often need documentary evidence to substantiate their allegations.". Second, " [a]llowing a whistleblower to appropriate documents supporting believed wrongdoing also mitigates the

https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/lbpgndllkvq/frankel-chemoursclassaction--confidentialwitnesscondundrum.pdf
cited as confidential witnesses in an amended securities fraud complaint against the aerospace company. Rakoff said the notes, as well as DLA's memos on the interviews and emails between DLA and the witnesses, are protected by the work-product doctrine. But that is not the end of the story for the Loc k heed confidential witnesses.

https://kkc.com/frequently-asked-questions/sec-whistleblowing-secret-recording-disclosures/
It's important to consider the legal implications associated with disclosing secret recordings, which might pose trouble for a whistleblower.

https://www.gibsondunn.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/publications/ReardenHarris-GrowingTrendFavorsDisclosureofWitnessesIdentities.pdf
Plaintiffs can properly exclude the identities of confidential witnesses referenced in a complaint from their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures if they do not intend to rely on those individuals "to support [their] claims or defenses.". Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). Under Rule 26(b)(1), however, "[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any