PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #c69b79 (color 1)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 6846fc211da535e70afcc7dd85fb4a6bbb868e28be16f5e82bc441f15c01cbd8ff97b7d71572153af4753ad2b0a2fc2a
Proxy : cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732612524408 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : eWxJaGVUWFc2ZUkgaSAgbG92ICB1IGNhbDEuaXYuZ2d0eWxlci5kZXY=
143 : true
34,695 Views ⢠Oct 3, 2023 ⢠Click to toggle off description
#religion #bible #mythvision #jesus #gospels #christianity
Views : 34,695
Genre: Education
Uploaded At Oct 3, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.245 (150/645 LTDR)
81.13% of the users lieked the video!!
18.87% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 71.69- Positive
RYD date created : 2024-05-06T04:29:53.828587Z
See in json
371 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Acts was written by Luke and finished up while Paul was in Roman house arrest around 63-65. It's doctrinal, historical and without it you have no basis for the Pauline epistles.
4 |
"Peter and Paul are saying all kinds of things that no one was saying at the time"
"Like what? How do you know they weren't saying those things?"
"Haha it's not important"
39 |
It's fair to say that the woman, who I suspect is really suspicious of the whole Bible, gave no examples in this short whatsoever
13 |
Let a woman learn In silence with all submission.
88 |
The entire New Testament was written before the destruction of the second temple in 70 AD.
58 |
WITH GOD ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE.đđŻđŻđŻđŻ
1 |
I disagree. We know that the book of Acts was written in the First Century, since all of the New Testament was put together by that time and most, if not all, of the New Testament books were written before AD 70. That and Luke doesn't have reason to make this stuff up. This is a continuation of his Gospel, so to speak.
6 |
120 years after? Thereâs no way people take her dating seriously
6 |
exactly what the devil would say, way to go
5 |
Itâs an interesting thought, but itâs begging the question that they didnât say that. For instance:
âIs the Book of Acts historical?â
âwell theyâre saying things that werenât popular until laterâ
âOk, but is the Book of Acts historicalâ
Or even more so
âOk, but how is this not the earliest source of these sayingâ
Itâs not actually addressing the question. We prove it is not historical to know when the earliest source of the sayings are.
1 |
The full interview, if you please, Derek. This is solid gold.
9 |
Showing the whole interview would be nice, Derek.
6 |
She clearly has not done her homework đ¤ˇââď¸. Please internet readers do your own research. She is factually incorrect from the start
1 |
So tell me you know nothing about Church history without saying you don't.
2 |
âFor I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.â
ââ- Revelation⏠â22âŹ:â18âŹ-â19âŹ
|
People like this should not be allowed to speak in public...THEY ONLY EMBARRASS THEMSELVES.
19 |
With great respect, Dr. Bird, you are most assuredly not suspect at all. Evidently you are very suspicious of the book of Acts, for several very compelling reasons.
3 |
The Book of Acts looks stitched together from various accounts. It doesnât look like it was carefully edited because at places it contradicts itself, especially the conversion account of Paul. Also Paul describes the events since his conversion very differently in his letters. I donât think Acts was ever meant to be read as inspired Word of God but just an attempt to collect the stories so we can roughly know what happened since the resurrection of Christ. We should not view any of the writings of the New Testament as on par with the TeNaCh but simply as a collection of writings of early Christianity. Having them exalted to the same status as the TeNaCh is what caused all the problems with the church.
7 |
The book of Acts is a transitional book.
God's focus of salvation changes from Jew to Gentile and from Peter to Paul in the book of Acts after the stoning of Stephen.
Prior to the stoning of Stephen the work of water baptism was required to receive the Holy Spirit and acquire salvation but after the stoning of Stephen through Paul's gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) you no longer need the work of water baptism because through Paul's gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) you get saved by faith alone without works.
|
@grantguidroz7640
1 year ago
But weâre supposed to take some womanâs word 2000 years after Paul
148 |