PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #c0cad0 (color 1)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 86dc4d5556b35df02a166a8728efe52616f746ae303f471543e951b45f546e7a3a0b49efc423c455e8cf067134b9d975
Proxy : cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1734623471592 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : YzM1ZmhReXhTakkgaSAgbG92ICB1IGNhbDEuaXYuZ2d0eWxlci5kZXY=
143 : true
13,901 Views • Mar 23, 2023 • Click to toggle off description
Views : 13,901
Genre: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Mar 23, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.884 (21/705 LTDR)
97.11% of the users lieked the video!!
2.89% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 95.67- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2023-12-29T20:06:16.492694Z
See in json
118 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Pressure is placed on Australians to feel they are not in good standing unless they agree. I am opposed to it as it is racially divisive, undemocratic, non-representative of Aboriginal diversity, politicians will not say No to its decisions despite claims it will have "no real power", and the debate will divide our communities and nation.
We know all Aboriginals hold the right to vote, like everyone else in Australia, and currently Aboriginals enjoy greater representation in the Federal Parliament on a per-capita basis. (Jacinta Price rhetorically asked Penny Wong in the parliament if there should be a special voice for Asians in the parliament).
If the Voice "won't have any real power" how will it be beneficial to Aboriginals in addition to current Aboriginal parliamentary representation, land councils, advisory bodies, etc? And if the Voice "won't have real power" why is it being put into the constitution? Reasonable people "smell a rat" especially given the over-reach of governments in the past couple of years.
23 |
NON Binding for NOW to get it across the line.
Can of worms comes to mind Instantly.
Bloody BIG ONES.
2 |
We can't have unelected people having a say in our parliament we are a democracy.
28 |
Why should anyone have more rights and representation in a democracy based on their ethnicity?
46 |
Ithink who ever brought this vote to referendum should get. Noble prize award 🥇
1 |
its about more money for aborigines who already get $35 billion a year for doing nothing.
12 |
he hasn't told us what the voice is
6 |
We voted overwhelmingly NO as a country. We will not change our constitution.
2 |
Vote yes for a better future for aboriginals.
3 |
Something to note. A lot of opposition comes from the fact that we are not voting on a clear law that creates a voice, merely giving government the power to create a voice. The details of the voice would be debated in parliament (which the Labor Party control).
They can say whatever they like during the campaign and then they will have the power to not follow through on any of it and implement their own agenda.
A lot of people, myself included, aren’t opposed to the voice, they’re opposed to the lack of detail and sneaky way the government is trying to force it through.
If we’re going to have a voice. Establish its powers and role first, and then let’s have a vote on that.
11 |
The Voice is a race based position.
The Voice will not be unrestricted because of race.
The Voice will literally be restricted especially because of race.
By definition The Voice will employ segregation and discrimination.
By definition The Voice is not open to all Australians.
The Voice is exclusive and race based, and has no place in a modern democratic, representative political system.
The Voice exercises segregation: the policy of keeping one group of people apart from another and treating them differently, especially because of race, sex, or religion.
A racially based position enshrined in a free and democratic nations constitution, inside the Australian constitution for whatever good intention is an anathema.
Human history, and Australian history has many examples, and instances of discrimination and segregation, being aware of this phenomenon might even help us avoid repeating such alienating, divisive, popular, crowd-pleasing, and overt virtue signalling.
The Voice fails to represent all Australians.
The Voice will embody structural racism.
The Voice will serve as structural racism.
The Voice will fail to represent the many different and distinct Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups, each with their own culture, language, beliefs and practices.
Genuine accurate facts are not dishonest scaremongering.
Disagreement with any change that is not democratic, and is not representative, and will be discriminatory. This is now deemed racist?🤔
Why yes let us as a proud multi-ethnic nation Australia, undermine our modern representative democracy in favour of divisive, popular, crowd-pleasing, and overt virtue signalling?
Why would we allow this?
How afraid and intimidated have we become in Australia?
The Voice is not a path to reconciliation, and harmony it is a path to entrench structural racism within our nation's constitution. Something that should be abhorrent to all Australians but particularly so to Indigenous Aboriginal, and Torres Strait Islander’s.
The only basis on which The Voice would make any sense would be if Indigenous Aboriginal, and Torres Strait Islander’s had no right to vote, and had no representation within Australia.
The Voice is clear political virtue signalling, so preposterous, almost psychotically senseless in its misleading claim that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups have no existing functioning Voice in Australia. (There are currently over a thousand Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Indigenous Australian representative bodies (Voices).)
If we need a Voice then indeed we Australia will need 1000, if not 10,000 other Voice’s to represent the specific needs of all the other groups, factions, organisations, cultures, party’s, sexual identities, ages, disabilities… that are not part of this narcissistic push for ‘special’ exclusive segregation and discrimination to favour only Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Indigenous Australian Australians.
If Australia as a nation feels that essentially our entire democratic system is failing us as a nation; then perhaps we should look into a less senseless and preposterous solution for this problem
25 |
There is a world of difference between a voice in parliament and a voice to parliament. A voice in parliament would be giving Aboriginal people guaranteed seats in the chamber.. This is what New Zealand has for their indigenous people and it is a great idea. But that is not what the Labor party is proposing. What the Labor party is proposing is effectively a tax payer funded lobby group. Note that we have had multiple such organisations in the past and they all got shut down due to either incompetence or corruption. Now we want to set one up that can't be shut down? It makes no sense.
2 |
I WILL VOTE NO.
15 |
I hope they some something, unfortunately as we saw in Chile just because most people want change doesn't mean that people agree on what kind of change
7 |
Where did you get your “non-binding advice” information from?
There is explicit documentation showing that the voice was required to give the power to force the governments hands when it came to negotiating treaty and such
|
This didn't age well. We voted no to a race based voice in parliament for a select few.
|
Yeah all is not what it seems!!
|
Vote NO to Apartheid.
19 |
It doesn't really change anything.. It's just a committee that gives advice no one has to listen too.. It just costs them money
2 |
@TLDRdaily
1 year ago
Watch the full Daily Briefing: https://youtu.be/ljlu-r42IEo
3 |