@bhaveshjugnauth

1 year ago

1. Fenrir is technically a god and a powerful monster, so it'd be logical how he is able to shatter the bifrost. And he did not destroy the bifrost he was shattered it, and since he is a gigantic monster he'd also add a large amount of pressure when running and since he is also technically an asgardian he'd be able to match characters with superstrength. And in thor 1, the bridge was channeling all its energy onto jotunheim scaling it to planetary, but in ragnarok it wasn't, it wasn't channeling energy thus it's one of the reason why the bridge can be shattered. And it wasn't normal bullets, it was highly advanced alien technology and we saw in marvel and dc just how effective alien technology really is.

2. Hela's blades are very powerful, but the reason it was able to pierce surtur and the ship is because, we all know blades are sharp, well hela's blades look like they are very sharp. Plus it wasn't the durability. Usually things with very high durability are also very brittle. Mandalorian steel for example has unmatched properties as it is very effective at deflecting blaster bolts and resisting lightsaber strikes. Yet if not solidified with carbon it is too brittle, one shock and it's gone. It's the same for hela's blades and bullets while very light travel at 1100m/s, at this point it's too much of a shock and thus breaking them.

3. Yes thor is above the spaceship and after the above explanation it's clear that thor's durability scale to multigalaxy level since the output of a collapsing neutron star is of at least half quadrillion stars.

4. Thor's lightning destroyed the layer of ice but a britch near the diameter of earth, since earth is small next to jotunheim. And ice while it's density is less than liquid water has such durability that you'd need at least a hammer. So his lightning destroying that gigantic layer of ice would scale at least continental-multicontinental.

5. Nidavellir's surface is at least 25000°C(50k kelvin) confirmed by Google. But the fact that it took 20 seconds to melt uru does not mean it was less than 10k kelvin. Because it wasn't the star that melted uru, it was the energy obtained the star but which had to be converted before. Why didn't they just shoot the star into the metal? We see the energy of the star passed through multiple tubes, and that's because the energy needs to be converted before lighting up the fire, because that much energy will destroy it. So passing it through multiple tubes would be logical so that it would not be too much. And also, it didn't automatically melt it, they boiled the giant pit in which was uru, so argument could be made that the pit resisted its very high temperature and thus the temperature of the fire would have been higher but it'd take time and the heat would dilute until it'd pass through it to melt the uru. And usually the heat does not count, it's the destructive capability. A nuke reachs 100 million celcius yet its destructive capability is limited to destroying a city. Nidavellir's surface was 50k kelvin but the weakest neutron star releases half trillion times more power than a star thus scaling it to galaxy level. So the beam thor took was 50 kelvin but its energy was more than an entire galaxy.

5. Thor's lightning destroyed sokovia, does that mean it's just town level? No, because the power stone for example can destroy a planet but it can also destroy stars, galaxies. Its hit can destroy anything irregular of its mass or size so that it destroyed one thing does not scale it just to the object. So thor's lightning while it destroyed a city does not does limit its destructive capability to a city, and in ragnarok that same lightning destroyed the bifrost which was at least continental.

So you do have good argument but still not enough. Educate yourself a bit and try to understand them before you try to debunk anything. And thor already overpowered the infinity stone which is enough to say he is high universal, and what's debunkable about it is easily rebunkable.

45 |