PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 385,845
Genre: Film & Animation
Uploaded At Apr 28, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.944 (175/12,365 LTDR)
98.60% of the users lieked the video!!
1.40% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.90- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-15T23:17:03.446672Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I don't know if this is an urban myth or not, and I'd be interested if someone could set me straight on this.
I do know in tank design that parts that worked, often could be found going way back, i.e. the engineering drawings rather than re-draw a part (that was proven and worked) would just reference back the last signed off copy no matter how far back that was, so there was a part on the Chieftain tank (a very minor part) that could be traced back to the 1930's.
So I was told that the cockpit door width and some of the panels from that on the Dash 80 came from the Boeing 377 StratoCruiser, which shared parts with earlier aircraft. The person who told me that was an old time aviation engineer and I'll be honest was always spot on about things, but I've never been able to pin this down, but it has fascinated me.
The reason we discussed this was, he pointed out how clever Boeing was at reusing parts that worked and that could be reused, whereas the British companies would virtually redesign from scratch every time, so it had to be recertified etc etc all costing more.
As I say, I'm just truly interested as to if there is anything to this.
6 |
@Timmayytoo
1 year ago
The 777 also has a double forehead for a similar reason - in order to keep pilot training relatively simple, the 777 uses the 767 flight deck and structure, so there is a double bump where the larger 777 fuselage meets the smaller 767 fuselage diameter.
218 |