PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d1d0d2 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 632fbf9e25bc05fbf05217cec157ea217b1a5cca68a5e3e054cbdb01db890e7eb8c1398e1e46433c78c07c64af329463
Proxy : cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732600322000 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : VHlVVW03UGpUS3MgaSAgbG92ICB1IGNhbDEuaXYuZ2d0eWxlci5kZXY=
143 : true
361,658 Views • May 24, 2024 • Click to toggle off description
Views : 361,658
Genre: Science & Technology
Uploaded At May 24, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.922 (454/22,749 LTDR)
98.04% of the users lieked the video!!
1.96% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.06- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-15T09:38:36.841634Z
See in json
253 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
So why the hell would anyone use option 1? Only thing I can think of is that having the electromagnets on the underside of the rail weights offer better protection against the environment, but literally everything else seems worse.
1.7K |
Something relevant is Earnshaw's theorem that basically guarantees instability in a system of point charges. You need some stabilizing component somewhere in the system. Ever wonder why passive magnetic bearings aren't really a thing? This is why. You need something like an electromagnetic control system, a physical point of contact, or something more exotic like a superconductor to stabilize the unstable system.
246 |
You used the wrong colors for the repulsive forces. The magnets are supposed to be aligned
1.1K |
Shouldnt the repulsive forces diagram show matching polarities against each other?
287 |
I never considered how inherently unstable the pulling approach is. TIL
220 |
The pulling approach has 2 big strengths: safety and wear.
Safety: If the levitation fails, you have a train with no wheels sliding along a rail, applying break force pretty much at every point touching the rail. The sideways guides will still work to keep the rail on track.
Wear: if the levitation fails, you are rubbing steel against steel. The brittle and expensive magnets are pulled away from the contact point, and are way less likely to break.
That push configuration looks like it's just begging to derail at the slightest amount of sideways force, with nothing to keep it going along the rail.
Yes, option 1 is unstable, in the control system sense. Option 2 is also unstable, but with less control measures to counteract the instability, or to deal with the consequences of failing to stabilize. Option 1 seems built with instability in mind. Option 2 seems like it's been included to talk about the physics/engineering, not as a fully developed transport solution.
37 |
As a non engineer, I'm gratified by the positive comments by obviously knowledgeable people.
Maglev is still the safest - can't derail,
Still the cheapest to operate and maintain,
Still the fastest, cruising at 300 mph,
Still the quietiest,
No moving parts except the doors; and maybe the sink faucets.
Chicago to New York - 3 hours
Chicago to Seattle - 7 hours
Total automation possible
3 |
Just a quick point: The Maglevs you show in the shorts are all German Transrapids, not Japanese trains.
15 |
"Repulsive forces"
Sounds like my aura😎
111 |
I've thought about this and even theorized about repulsive levitation rails with a stronger attraction rail (but set farther to equilibrium the repulsion) in the middle to act as guidance, only to find Chinese engineers have beaten me to it with retrofitted SAFEGE suspension train.
17 |
When I was a kid I came up with an idea of electromagnetic repulsion train. When I learned those exist I became really sad because I wasn't fast enough to invent it
3 |
“Aww, it’s not for you… it’s more of a Shelbyville thing” 😂
3 |
While repulsion has its advantages, magnets will decay faster if continuously repelling. They last a lot longer as magnets when their magnetic forces ate always pulled into alignment.
That one reason pull is better then repel.
1 |
surely a properly tuned PID loop can hold it in place even if it is an unstable equilibrium
1 |
> short about japan's maglev train
> shows clips from the german magnetschwebebahn
1 |
better to say that option 1 is unstable vertically but stable horizontally and option 2 is stable vertically buty unstable horizontally.
for option 2 i wonder if its possible to have 2 repulsion magnets on both sides and 1 slightly attractive magnet in the middle
1 |
Option 3: Wingardium Leviosa
21 |
What about the lateral force needed for cornering "the centripetal force" how it is generated,or just the inward tilt of the rail is sufficient?
20 |
You could also mount the rails above the train.
1 |
@amazingamx1255
6 months ago
The solution is to mostly use pulling force with push force being there for more stability
169 |