High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : SUmDQR8ECzk
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #cfbdb4 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 5494dfc32e2fc8768c950bb521128736015bc8d3104c3928e5547e72f2d75aa18104584f4430502066ebc7f23d141e25
Proxy : cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732873543099 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : U1VtRFFSOEVDemsgaSAgbG92ICB1IGNhbDEuaXYuZ2d0eWxlci5kZXY=
143 : true
573 Views • Oct 21, 2024 • Click to toggle off description
FULL EPISODE:    • Matt Kaeberlein reflects on "David Si...  

Subscribe to our channel:    / @optispan  

In this episode, Matt and Nick react to investigative journalist and author Scott Carney's video describing what he calls "David Sinclair's longevity lie" in the context of David's longevity-focused entrepreneurial ventures. Matt shares his professional history with David, including his early interactions with David in Leonard Guarente's lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and scientific differences that emerged after Matt and colleagues were unable to reproduce a key result from David's work pertaining to resveratrol. Their discussion touches on some of David's scientific claims about age reversal, the role of institutions such as Harvard University in regulating scientific integrity, the potential for future interventions in healthspan and longevity, and the importance of separating personal feelings from scientific evaluation.

David, currently a professor in Harvard Medical School's Department of Genetics at the Paul F. Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research, is a prominent geroscience researcher whose lab focuses on age-related epigenetic change, cellular reprograming, longevity drug discovery, mitochondrial fitness, reproductive aging, neurodegenerative disease, and the human secretome. He has received awards including the National Institutes of Health Nathan Shock Award, the Merck Prize, and the Australian Medical Research Medal, and was elected to TIME's 2014 “100 Most Influential People in the World" list. David conducted postdoctoral research at MIT and obtained a PhD in Molecular Genetics at the University of New South Wales.

DISCLAIMER: The information provided on the Optispan podcast is intended solely for general educational purposes and is not meant to be, nor should it be construed as, personalized medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is established by your use of this channel. The information and materials presented are for informational purposes only and are not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We strongly advise that you consult with a licensed healthcare professional for all matters concerning your health, especially before undertaking any changes based on content provided by this channel. The hosts and guests on this channel are not liable for any direct, indirect, or other damages or adverse effects that may arise from the application of the information discussed. Medical knowledge is constantly evolving; therefore, the information provided should be verified against current medical standards and practices.
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 573
Genre: Science & Technology
Uploaded At Oct 21, 2024 ^^


warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 5 (0/33 LTDR)

100.00% of the users lieked the video!!
0.00% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 100.00- Masterpiece Video

RYD date created : 2024-10-23T14:25:09.340607Z
See in json
Tags
Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report an issue lol

5 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@bob-ss4wx

1 month ago

If people aren't trained to publish papers then they shouldn't publish papers!

|

@Alexander300gr

1 month ago

I agree but consider the money factor, it skews everything. Real science will begin during the age of abundance.

|

@dude861

1 month ago

Sure, says someone from the system. But the system itself is the problem. Scientists follow the money, because they have to in order to get their studies funded. And that of course affects the results. There are even studies about this, showing that the results clearly tend to be more positive for the money donator despite the leading scientists claim to be objective. Nonetheless, in most areas science work. Just health science seems to be corrupted to the bones. After decades of nutritional science most is still in the dark. While we know exactly what every animal on the planet should eat, we are constantly blinded about our own nutrition. Because there is too much money in the line.

|

Go To Top