PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #cbc3be (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: e333423853143b874c0642dae3ddd4cc318ceedd55dcdb6bea34d6be2a16c6a699db85ab827ca0adbbec9466a358420a
Proxy : cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732906356972 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : UktEd0Z1aWdwVmcgaSAgbG92ICB1IGNhbDEuaXYuZ2d0eWxlci5kZXY=
143 : true
348 Views ⢠Mar 9, 2022 ⢠Click to toggle off description
   â˘Â Where Do Moral Laws Come From? (Greg ... Â
Best of âŞ@PaulogiaâŹ
youtube.com/c/paulogia
Views : 348
Genre: Nonprofits & Activism
Uploaded At Mar 9, 2022 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.574 (5/42 LTDR)
89.36% of the users lieked the video!!
10.64% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 84.04- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2022-03-11T05:01:56.771293Z
See in json
41 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Moral laws have lawmakers: People. OMG! He just proved the existence of people with the moral argument. This changes everything.
8 |
Add this to the pile of circular argunents, allng with creation requires a creator.
1 |
double checks my nephew's preschool notes
yep, Paul is correct, its circular!
1 |
The circular reasoning of the Ravi Zacharias argument.
2 |
Round and around we go.
2 |
Circular reasoning at its finest
4 |
Simple enough. Requires imagination too.
1 |
Is it posible for theist to start any claim with out using âifâ as the first word out of their mouth?
2 |
Bread making is circular:
Bread makers require bread. Bread proves Breadmaker!
|
The thing is I don't already agree that "moral laws" exist like it is some kind of created thing. Moral laws or tenets are an idea meant to achieve a certain goal.
The "laws of the universe" is a term we use to describe our observation of it. We can't "break" the laws of the universe, because otherwise what we thought we broke just becomes a feature of the universe.
The "rules of football" are designed by humans to achieve a certain goal. You can however break the rules of football.
If a standard is always necessary to determine objectivity, then by what standard do we determine that standard if we cannot trust ourselves?
Muslims can say that the Quran is the standard for moral objectivity too. If people worshipped the Norse gods, they too would say it is objectively moral to kill others based on their texts.
|
When I was a younger Christian I thought Greg Koukl was such a fantastic, strong, sound logical thinker and apologist. Same for Low Bar Bill and Ravi Zacharias. But, the more they opened their mouths...
|
Too short
3 |
but are all moral laws moral? Who decides that? The moral law JUDGE! and WHO made the moral law judge? A MOTHER. MOTHERS ARE GOD!
1 |
There is actually nothing wrong with circular reasoning. All reasoning is either unfounded or it has an infinite regress or it is circular.
|
Yes, xD
2 |
algorithm
1 |
No it isn't. By definition it is a deductive argument for God to decree something from His rightful throne in heaven. Are you suggesting that the president makes a circular argument every time he makes an executive order? Atheists desperately need to work on their definition and logic game. Sad!
|
Circular reasoning isn't always a problem
All worldviews are circular by nature. You cannot go beyond your own axioms or foundational principles of reasoning. Hence, circular reasoning isn't always a logical fallacy.
It's only a problem when it because circular and undermines itself .
There's a difference between vicious circular reasoning and non vicious circular reasoning
|
@mariedinkler8542
2 years ago
Such a comforting voice. Do random comments help??
9 |