PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 23,737
Genre: Education
Uploaded At Mar 2, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.873 (51/1,552 LTDR)
96.82% of the users lieked the video!!
3.18% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 95.23- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2023-04-04T16:43:05.743938Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
A large part of these costs is that it takes X number of hours of flight time to train a pilot.
The bigger and rarer the plane, the more it costs per hour of flight time.
Older airframe designs (early Cold-War-era vs later designs) also need more hours of maintenance work per hour of flight time, which gets factored into the $$ / hour.
Aircraft which are more widely manufactured will have greater economies of scale on manufacturing parts, so very-rare aircraft are going to cost a fortune on parts, which adds to the $$ / hour. The F-15, F-16 and F-35 are still being manufactured, so that helps keep parts costs down.
The B-52 (an early Cold-War-era aircraft) burns a hideous amount of fuel per hour (8 engines on that bird) and needs a significant number of hours of maintenance per hour of flight time. While a significant number have been mothballed, parts for that bird are getting rare, as the parts in the boneyard are getting used up.
The B-1 burns a significant amount of fuel (four engines with afterburners) but it needs fewer hours of maintenance per hour of flight time (later airframe design). A lot of B-1s have been going to the boneyard, so parts aren't much of a problem. So it likely costs less $$ / hour of flight time. That's why it's the cheapest of the bombers.
The B-2, as a very rare and expensive aircraft, is going to cost a fortune on parts. With 4 engines, it consumes significant quantities of fuel. With the stealthy paint, maintenance costs a fortune. The advanced systems on-board means there is more technology to master. The B-2 needs less maintenance, per hour, as the systems on-board are able to troubleshoot a great many issues, streamlining the amount of work it takes to isolate and repair an issue.
The F-22 is the most expensive fighter to master because it's a rare aircraft (fewer of them made than any other fighter still flying), has twin afterburning engines (thirsty beast) and has a stealthy paint job.
The F-16, with a single engine and VERY large numbers built (pretty sure it is the most widely produced fighter in active service), is a comparative bargain in terms of $$ / hour flight time. Also, as a later design, it needs fewer hours of maintenance per hour of flight time, helping to keep costs down.
The F-35 will be cheaper than the F-22 (not as rare, single engine, both have stealthy paint jobs, still being manufactured) while the F-15 will be more expensive than the F-16 (two engines and fewer of them built).
The F-35 has more-advanced systems on-board, so there is more for the pilot to master, which increases the number of hours needed to be fully qualified.
I expect the U-2 is extremely expensive to train pilots, as there are very few of them, the airframe is a very old design and parts are getting scarce. Also, it uses a different fuel than the rest; lower manufacturing quantity means more $$ / gallon.
|
Pros and cons of AI pilots
Pros and cons of AI pilots
Pros:
* AI pilots follow orders
* No loss of human life, skill and experience because the AI pilot will be backed up on a server somewhere
* Experience for failed missions/flights due to crashes or other problems can be learnt from and the AI pilot can be updated and upgraded
* AI pilots will have more accuracy and manoeuvrability then human pilots (especially for high G sustained Manouvers)
* specific and unique experiences that one generation of human pilots can be lost and not introduced to new human pilots. AI pilots (assuming the data is transferred before the data is lost) will have a greater likelihood of keeping generational skills and experiences
* AI pilots do not get tired, need to go to the toilet, require leave and rest
* Ai pilots do not get depressed so there is no risk of PTSD or suicide
* AI pilots follow orders
Cons:
* AI pilots follow orders
* AI pilots are at risk of getting hacked
* AI pilots are at risk of EMPs
* AI pilots are at risk of communication blackout resulting in no orders to follow ( this can cause the AI pilot to return to base which can be used against itself)
* AI pilots (at lest for now) have vary limited programming which means the AI pilot can only respond to specific and limited situations
* AI pilots (at lest for now) cannot adapt to new and unforeseen circumstances and overcome them
* AI pilots (at lest for now) do not have the hardware to be as situationally aware as human pilots
As of the 2020s AI pilots are are vary limited in what they can do and human pilots completely outclass them and human pilots will remain for decades to come.
However AI (just like any technology) will improve over time and if the human form does not improve itself mentally or physically then inevitably AI pilots will rule the sky’s.
Please fell free to add to this list
3 |
yea, but wouldn't that cost be spread out over all three platforms? Meaning to fly a B-2, those pilots where B-1 and/or B-52 pilots to start and then when through B-2 flight school, so more money. However, B-2 pilots can also fly the other platforms and some can fly fighters. Military costs are, um, more complicated than tiktok...just sayin.
|
@redrum3835
1 year ago
I'm Mexican I can operate anything for a fraction of the cost.
75 |