PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 11,237
Genre: Education
Uploaded At Nov 10, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.77 (45/739 LTDR)
94.26% of the users lieked the video!!
5.74% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 91.39- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-06-09T02:48:16.237711Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
That man drives me crazy.. It's like non- stop made up nonsense is constantly spewing from his mouth hole.. Have you ever taken a trip to his comments section on his videos? It's cancer.. it's entertaining and intriguing to people. That's how I started.. good old Hancock mania.. Then I started digging deeper and doing some research.. The more I learned, the more my interest and fascination grew in synchronicity.. this channel has been a breath of fresh air as we travel around the world digging a bit deeper to find the truth as best we can. Love your channel! â€
27 |
Come on Ben enough is enough! I am a retired CNC machinist professional. If the Egyptians had this technology, you would expect to see thousands upon thousands of dimensionally identical vases as well as vases scaled up and or down from a common profile. This is not seen in the archaeological record. It would also easy to machine air tight lids and stoppers. None have been found. Why would anyone protect the contents of a vessel with a seal of mud or leather if a superior rock alternative could be readily made? To my trained eye all these vases look like they are one-off, handmade. Assuming this is correct, it would actually be devilishly difficult to make an airtight matching lid because it would be extremely difficult to achieve the required tolerances by hand.
4 |
A whole new breed of snake oil salesman has BEN created. They don't need to sell you anything, just collect the ad revenue checks from YouTube. I guess he has merch now too and it's only a matter of time before he's selling tours like Brian Foerster down in Peru. Very sad to see these men prey on other cultures like leeches and actively spread proven false information from the 1800s.
2 |
Every STL file Ben posted on his website is broken or incomplete. The meshes are non-manifold, aka just mesh plane fragments.
AND, where the mesh is present on the interior and adjacent exterior, the thickness is in centimeters, it's not paper thin at all. The drill holes in the lug handles are also missing mesh data.
5 minutes in any program that can read or slice STLs will show it.
Ben also claimed that an X-Ray CT scan was used, so he should still have the original slice files from that procedure. He doesn't offer those because he didn't actually pay for that procedure.
His buddies used a cheap 3D scanner to get those STL results.
A complete lie from UnchartedX.
8 |
There is a Potter up the road from me that can and does turn out sets of cups with handles and all 4 cups and their saucers look like clones.
I have a set and I can turn the cups lip to lip and the edges are so smooth and regular that they will seal together as they cool from the dishwasher.
All done by eye with no power tools.
3 |
I can't freaking stand that guy, he just cannot wrap his head around humans being able to create amazing things, he's obviously someone who has never seen a real stone mason or master woodworker in action, it blows my mind that these people think that humans couldn't possibly do or make certain things but we can make skyscrapers, bridges, dams, airplanes ect yes it was these are done in modern times with modern technology but it shows what humans are capable of when we work together
1 |
So let's pretend that all of the vases he has scanned are genuine for sake of argument. Let's also ignore known experiments and the entire stone turning/headstone industry for a moment. Let's also ignore the fact that collectors specifically choose the best artifacts to collect.
Let us instead look at both the collection of vases he scanned and collections in museums. We can plainly see ones in museums showing a lack of symmetry and "perfection." They are made of the same stone and found in the same context. Ben will shift the goalposts and say they were copied and only the precision ones are made by the lost high technology culture. Yet, he heavily leans on the "fact" Egyptians couldn't carve and shape these stones. It's a pretty big implication by him made many times at the very least.
So then what is the percentage to precision vs lack of precision. Ben will argue that it takes an impracticable amount of time to make these artifacts with simple means. That begs the question; what is the percentage of both types? He of course has no idea. No explanation really for how the imprecise one's exhibit the same characteristics (as in the thinness of the walls and locations of the handles for example) yet also have a lack of symmetry.
Either they (ancient Egyptians) could or couldn't make these objects. Well, clearly they could make decent copies by his own logic. So that alone debunks his points. But it can even go further. How many objects were created? Tens of thousands? What are the statistics of some being nearly perfect?
18 |
I have on more than one occasion commented on Benâs stuff (respectfully) about how he is extrapolating info from something he has seen incorrectly about how he creates a strawman, like archeologist-have no idea how this is done(spoiler they do) and his simps tear me apart or attempt to. No facts I say are enough Iâve also had my comments deleted. Delusional people are exhausting
6 |
@AncientPuzzles
1 year ago
As long as he makes money, Ben will go full pyramidiot with these vases no matter how ridiculous it is
85 |