PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 85,694
Genre: Education
Uploaded At Aug 27, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.907 (159/6,704 LTDR)
97.68% of the users lieked the video!!
2.32% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.52- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-10-09T20:28:34.902254Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
He kept asking Avery if The Gospel of John was given to Jesus which was entirely irrelevant to Averys argument. Avery is saying that they don't know what the Gospel is regardless of whether it was a biography or not. Why ask a question about The Gospel of John content/providence if you don't know what The Gospel of John IS??!!
52 |
"We don't know the contents of the injeel, but we know it wasn't a biography.....even though we know absolutely nothing about it."
Further, they keep saying it was something revealed TO Jesus, not realizing Jesus IS the revelation. The Gospel is the biography of Jesus' atoning sacrifice to save sinners.
57 |
These critics claimed that the oral Gospel was changed and replaced, while they ignored that during the collection of the Qur'an, some texts fell, so Abdul Rahman bin Ouf spoke to Omar's speech in the people and said: "Is not and if people say what is stoning in the Book of God, but in it is flogging, and the Messenger of God stoned and stoned us after it, and if it were not for a saying or speaker who spoke that Omar increased in the Book of God what is not from him to prove it as it was revealed with it" (cf. Ibn Kathir interpretation of Surat Al-Nur verse 2).
Ibn Majah said about Aisha: “The verse of stoning and breastfeeding the great was revealed ten. It was a newspaper under my bed. When the Prophet died and we were preoccupied with his death, Dajin went in and ate it” (see Ibn Majah Hadith 1944, v. 1 p. 626, Dar Al-Revival of the Arabic Book) as "Dr. Sayyid Al-Qamni": "What is related to what was stated in Sahih Muslim by explaining Al-Nawawi (1/29) and reported by Ibn al-Jawzi, from (Aisha, may God be pleased with her) she said: "The verse of stoning and the Kabeer's breastfeeding of the ten, and it was revealed, and it was in a paper under the bed of my house, when the Messenger of God (peace be upon him) complained (Sick) complained about his order, so ate it was eaten by a stepdaughter for us (m Thus, the status of the verse of Reza' al-Kabeer is the same status as the verse of the stoning of the Sheikh and they do not exist in the Holy Book of God, not because they were copied, but because the first was eaten by the sheef while the second, was not written in the first place.
4 |
@isaacgazemba5710
2 months ago
Stay in the pot😂
630 |