PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 148,070
Genre: Sports
Uploaded At Aug 31, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.965 (86/9,607 LTDR)
99.11% of the users lieked the video!!
0.89% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 98.67- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2024-10-15T06:21:22.707184Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
It's basically a matter of smart accounting. This fight will keep going as FFP tries to stop teams from bending the rules or breaking them. When one loophole is closed, big clubs just get their accountants to find another. You have to wonder what the Premier Leagueās lawyers are doing. If club lawyers keep finding these loopholes, why arenāt the leagueās lawyers spotting them first? This has been happening for years..just look at how Man City has sold some of their young players for high prices. The real issue is that other clubs are starting to do the same. If the goal is to help academy players grow, the rules should make it better for teams to keep them instead of selling them. Iām also worried about the problems with Man City that havenāt been solved yet. Thereās talk of inflated sponsorships and paying players under the table. I think itās time for a salary cap. Clubs keep finding ways to bend the rules with fake sponsorships and overpriced transfers, and the Premier League only enforces its rules when it wants to. The league is getting boring and needs a big change. The Premier League is at an important turning point for the future of football . Sky is losing customers fast, and the value of TV rights is dropping every year. Iād prefer the government step in rather than let clubs be owned by people who donāt care about the long-term future of the game.
272 |
For anyone wondering how it works, itās amortisation. You get to spread the value of the incoming player over the length of their contract. So Villa spent 10m on a player with a 5 year contract so have spent 2m this season in the books (and each of the next 4 seasons), whilst they sold a player for 9m that gets banks this season. So whilst actually spending 1m more, in the accounts they have made 7m this summer.
This also has the effect of making big money transfers harder. Look at Chelsea with Lukaku for example. Chelsea couldnāt sell Lukaku last summer because he had only been there for 2 years meaning he had 60m of fees to pay off in accounts. So if he stayed, he had 20m to amortise, if they sold him for 30m, it was an accounting loss of 30m so Chelsea would have ālostā 10m more in their books. This summer they only got 25m but he only had 40m accounting value to amortise, so Chelsea only ālostā 15m instead of 20m, so they booked a āprofitā of 5m in spite of getting less money.
93 |
If you sell a player with no book value (a youth player for example) for Ā£20m, youāre able to record a Ā£20m PSR profit. If you then buy another player for Ā£20m, youād amortise that cost over the length of the contract (usually 5 years) so youād record a PSR cost of only Ā£4m per year. Ā£20m in, Ā£4m out, despite both players in this instance having the same nominal value. Meaning you have another Ā£16m to spend elsewhere. Simple.
15 |
@ĪĻĪ½ĻĻĪ±Ī½ĻĪÆĪ½ĪæĻĪ Ī±ĻĪ±Ī½Ī±ĻĻĪ±ĻĪÆĪæĻ -Ļ 8Ļ
2 months ago
This is straight up the only reason we brought Kellyman
371 |