PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #c0859a (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: effb108b86e0c0a879d8c53f46c1b99d1090ad7602380756c38c9db8f0bf0a60d6909cd0645c53998f5f88313e5043c3
Proxy : cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732582132597 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : MHh5YkNIQU0tUkEgaSAgbG92ICB1IGNhbDEuaXYuZ2d0eWxlci5kZXY=
143 : true
201,869 Views • Jun 3, 2023 • Click to toggle off description
Here's a breakdown on the differences between these aircraft, and their places within America's approach to air warfare.
#short #shorts #airpower #f22 #f22raptor #f35 #stealth #stealthfighter
📱 Follow Sandboxx News on social
Twitter: twitter.com/sandboxxnews
Instagram: instagram.com/sandboxxnews
Facebook: facebook.com/sandboxxnews
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@sandboxxnews
📱 Follow Alex Hollings on social
Twitter: twitter.com/AlexHollings52
Instagram: www.instagram.com/alexhollings52
Facebook: www.facebook.com/AlexHollingsWrites
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/alexhollings52
Views : 201,869
Genre: Education
Uploaded At Jun 3, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.934 (183/10,875 LTDR)
98.35% of the users lieked the video!!
1.65% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.52- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-07-25T17:36:07.496087Z
See in json
620 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Don’t forget that the F-35 has more advanced datalinks and sensor fusion. It can lock onto a target and a destroyer can use that targeting data to launch its own missile and vice versa. Legacy aircraft only have Link-16, which is good for knowing where the enemy is, but not good for shooting them down
121 |
The US invested in the F-35 because it was promised that it would perform the same roles at a much lower price and maintenance cost. The F-22 is also nigh impossible to upgrade/update unlike the F-35 which was designed to be modular and easy to keep up to spec for many years to come.
Whether the F-35 program achieved its goals is debatable though.
310 |
Cost is also a factor. The F-22 was even more expensive (not surprising given that it has 2 engines vs 1). In particular, the stealth capability on the F-22 is also said to be much more expensive & difficult to maintain. One of the goals of the F-35 program was to increase maintainability of the stealth system/coating.
8 |
The F-35 is cheaper now also, thats the main reason, and it's more advanced.
34 |
The F-16 was a ground attack aircraft? I thought it was optimized for dogfighting and that it supported the air superiority mission of the F-15 by being a cost-effective supplement to its larger brethren.
67 |
Not to forget that the F-35B variant provides a VSTOL capability, and the US Marines are rather keen on that (as well as the Royal Navy, if that matters).
12 |
reformers rolling in their graves at "f-16 made for attack roles"
107 |
If you tag along F-22s with F-35s the F35s are free to attack ground targets while the F-22 watch their backs. That's the point.
8 |
F/A-18 Hornet and Super Hornet left the building
15 |
I like to imagine the F-22 as the top tier special forces soldier. Fewer in number but with high skills and beastly capabilities in operations.
While the F-35 are like the Army Rangers or USMC. Good all-around muscle that still retains a high level skillset.
26 |
The F-22 was designed to dominate airspace by destroying enemy aircraft. The F-35 was evolved into an aircraft meant to suppress and/or destroy enemy air defenses. Both aircraft can also do other jobs and do them better than any other aircraft in the world.
28 |
The F-16 is not an attack aircraft. It’s a lightweight multi role fighter, initially built for air to air combat and very little air to ground. Its range is still too little for interdiction and long range strike missions. And while the later blocks are proven bombers, they’re not USAF’s primary attack aircraft—that’s the F-15E and A-10.
The F-35 was primarily meant to replace the AV-8, F-15E, F/A-18C, Super Hornet, A-10 and to finally fill the void that the A-6 and F-111 left behind.
While it is replacing the F-16, it’s replacing the F-16 primarily in short-range air-to-air and the secondary precision strike role of the F-16.
4 |
F-35 can also launch from carriers where the F-22 does not have a hook attachment to land on a carrier.
3 |
Great video.
|
Well done!
|
As far as I know, the F-35 was built as an aircraft that was low observable that could be sold to other countries.
Because the u.s. didn't want to sell the F-22 and give it's technology away.
The B-21 has the same RCS as the 22.
The only aircraft that had better RCS than the 22 was the YF-23.
2 |
The Falcon was an air to air fighter too. I heard the Lightning is supposed to be air to air as well, but it's not too fast for a jet. But it does have more range than any other aircraft.
Based on what I heard of it, it's more of a jet sniper than a fast, dog fighter.
3 |
Love The Alex
|
there's way more to it as well. The F22's systems are not compatible with the current direction of systems we are going. As such, it's nearly impossible to upgrade and integrate new avionics into it. The F35 on the other hand, was build from the ground up using lessons learned from the F22 and prioritized the ability to upgrade the avionics. One example: the F22 is currently the only U.S. combat fixed wing aircraft that does not have a Helmet mounted system, why? the avionics can't support what we eventually went with. The F22 is an amazing air superiority fighter, but, it's days are numbered and it is a product of an old way of thinking and designing. There will never be a variant beyond the A model.
1 |
@MaxwellAerialPhotography
1 year ago
The fact that people can’t wrap their heads around the fact that the Joint Strike Fighter, is in fact, a mutlirole fight bomber, is kinda worrying.
589 |